Contra-argument to "technology advances beyond the levels of outdated tech being relevant".
The Boeing B-52 Stratofortress was introduced into the USAF in 1955 and is still being updated and flown in 2011. The USAF intends to continue to keep the venerable aircraft in service until 2040. It has outlived the Rockwell B1B and is in greater demand as a conventional bomber than the Lockheed B2, it is also technologically easier to mass produce and cheaper to maintain a fleet of the aircraft.
And that is a product of a major innovator in military technological development, and military development always trickles down into the civilian sector.
The Rockwell B1B was intended to replace the B-52, it was leagues more advanced in systems and design than the WWII design of the B-52... and for all its advancement was a complete failure.
The B2 was also purported to replace the B-52, but that will never happen as a country can build around three B-52's for the cost of a single B2. Which leaves the B2 in a very specialized role where as the B-52 can be considered a generalized platform, able to perform a variety of roles with only minimal conversion.
Now, consider third world nations. What do they use? Lets scale down and consider infantry warfare, or civilian/rebel defense principles. The Kalashnikov AK-47 is still is use around the world, in several locally manufactured variants, and was first put into service in 1946. It will continue to be used for at least another 50 to 60 years easily, probably longer. Why? Because it works, it works well, and it has a greater mass production than associated technologies. It is also simple to manufacture, service, maintain, and utilize.
In a world such as Pandora-style Earth, where the social disparity between the haves and have-not's has turned into an insurmountable chasm, and violence is certainly the rule and not the exception, what would be the order of the day? Who would have the resources to the best technologies? Who would have availability to those technologies?
What would everybody ELSE be using? The newest and best tech, or things that were in use from decades/centuries before?
Technological development goes hand in hand with society, the strongest societies/nations make the leaps and bounds, as a result of conflicts with other societies/nations. When society collapses the ability of a strong nation to continue development likewise collapses, and the industry of that nation invariably stagnates. Leaving the population to use devices that are well behind the curve, as the general populace doesn't know or trust the "new technologies", while the government and society falls like a flan in a cupboard.
When a world is on the brink of dying, with all natural resources virtually exhausted, overpopulation placing an extreme demand on the few resources that remain, no nation should have the capacity to enforce anything other than a token authority over the masses... as there simply are more of the proletariat than the bourgeoisie. Thus one could concievably view the crux of the global population as existing in a "third world" state of society, and exposed only to the technologies that have proven themselves sustainable in an environment when "disposable" no longer has any viability. Meaning technologies that can be used easily, repaired readily, and replaced quickly should it break down. Technologies that have been so grossly mass produced that they are everywhere, are so generalized they can serve multiple functions or in multiple roles, and are so simplistic in design that even lacking skill in that device virtually anyone (from a child to an adult that has never seen such a machine before) can use one effectively.
Ergo, what has been outdated by the power of technological development surely does not indicate a general inability to use those technologies properly.
If a pilot can fly a jumpship from Earth to an orbital station he/she can certainly fly a B-52 without crashing it into a mountain.
If an engineer can pop open a fusion reactor and reboot an AI system he/she can jump start a combustion powered automobile and use a 21st century computer.
As to the lay man... even tribals from the deserts of North Africa can figure out how to drive a Toyota truck, when up to the recent past they rode camels or walked. They used percussion cap rifles up until the 1930's and now they carry AK's.
When you are planning an expedition to a world, where you will spend the rest of your life with (presumably) no contact with the place of your birth (Earth), will you bring along specialists that cannot work without access to the tools of the modern era, or will you tap generalists that can make the best out of any possible environment? Will you load up with technologies that require specific parts, only manufactured at expense and from resources that are difficult to obtain, or will you stock your holds with the most rugged and simplistic tools... or (most likely) will you pack up with whatever you can find that is dependable and cheap, and plan on making due with what your destination provides?
The colony will have its specialists, tis true, as specialists have money and such an expedition cannot happen without plenty of funding... which I'd hazard to say the federal government wouldn't have a whole lot of (considering the US is already in debt to China - and obviously the colony on Pandora was not a Chinese establishment). So some Corperation, or private interest, would foot the bill for the exodus to Pandora... or a national conglomerate, which is just as likely but we shall see what the ethnic demographic looks like after people start making characters.
Either way, there will be specialists, and tools that are every bit the cutting edge. HOWEVER the majority would have to be generalists, with the majority of the supplies and technologies being generalist in design and construction.
This means analogs to common technologies that would be fairly commonplace 50 to 100 years prior. This excludes technologies that would never be common (such as the ship that carried the colonists) and technologies that by nature must be specialized (such as atmospheric scrubbers for the colony environmental system), but transport and tools, and especially weapons systems, would not really have changed much I'd say.
The knife has not changed in thousands of years, and all military groups still train in knife combat.
Bottom line, done fix what isn't broken.
Offshoot argument...
We have seen the movie, it establishes certain world principles (Na'vi = native Americans, RDA = evil corporate mongers, Mercenary military = violent jugheads in power suits), and to deviate too much from the acceptable means rewriting the world setting. At which point why not just make an original RP and forget about trying to associate with the product of the mind of some other author?
AMP suits are cool to look at, and we can always pop on the DVD and watch it to get an idea of how they move and what they are capable of. Sure, after 150 years humanity would have better, but why reinvent the wheel when the AMP we have been given works and works well? Some minimal variation on the theme should be acceptable as being the common workhorse of the colonists... with individual players adding their own limited flavor to the mix (with their own devices or transportation/tools).
The tilt-rotor Sampsons, very cool to look at. Probably existed in a variety of civilian versions on Earth. Again, pop in the DVD and you can see how they fly. Simple design, looks fairly open so simple to repair and service, might as well go with what works... and what is readily familiar to a fan of the movie, and keep them in place as the standard lift vehicle of the RP.
Compare them to the JEEP, a workhorse concept that is still in service since WWII (the Hummer is just a souped up JEEP really), and the Bell UH-1 Iroquois Huey-Helicoper (from 1959 folks, and STILL going strong). Some things, no matter how old they get, still get used.
Truth be told, even though I have no idea how to hitch an oxen to a plow, there ARE plenty of people that do.
Would I get tapped to head out to the stars and try and replant the human species on a new world? HELLS NO! Would my cousin, the blacksmith/farmer/hunter/inventor? Damn skippy he would. Along with a majority of the people that live along the same mountain area I'd guess. Generalists, the whole lot of 'em.
heh
The prosecution rests.
*ponders*
What the hell was my point anyway? LOL